DSpace logo
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://172.20.40.131:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/321
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGupta, Sagarkumar-
dc.contributor.authorSolanki, Mehul I-
dc.contributor.authorMaharaul, Honeypalsinh H-
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-22T04:30:46Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-22T04:30:46Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn2455-0566-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/321-
dc.description.abstractAims & objectives: To compare post-operative complications between open prostatectomy (FREYER`S) and T.U.R.P. Material and Methods: Patients, who were candidates for prostate surgery & had been referred to urology outpatient clinic in our hospital between December 2011 to September 2013, were enrolled for the study. These patients were then divided in two groups – A and B randomly, by using the process of randomization. Group A comprised of patients for open prostatectomy and Group B of patients for T.U.R.P. Conclusion: In expert hands and with proper monitoring facilities TURP is the best method of prostatectomy for small glands. However in a country like ours where all ideal facilities are not available freyer`s method will still be widely practiced for long periods.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherInternational Journal of Biomedical Researchen_US
dc.subjectOpen Prostatectomy (Freyer’s)en_US
dc.subjectTURP (Trans Urethral Resection Of Prostate)en_US
dc.titleA Comparative Study of Post Operative Complications of Open Prostatectomy (Fryer’s) Versus Trans Urethral Resection of Prostateen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2488-Article Text-5965-2-10-20151024.pdf1.15 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.