DSpace logo
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://172.20.40.131:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/3507
Title: Comparison between Ropivacaine 0.25% and Bupivacaine 0.25% in Paediatric Caudal Anaesthesia in Infra Umbilical Surgeries (A Study of 60 Cases)
Authors: Sharma, Tejash H.
Sharma, Kaushik
Chauhan, Dinesh
Patel, Jatin
Shah, Nilam
Keywords: Caudal Block
Bupivacaine 0.25%
Ropivacaine 0.25%
Paediatric
Infra Umbilical Surgeries
Age 4-6 Years
Issue Date: Dec-2020
Publisher: International Journal of Current Research and Review
Abstract: Background: Caudal epidural is the most common regional anaesthesia technique for treating post-operative pain in pediatric patients. It is commonly used for procedures like urogenital, rectal, inguinal and lower extremity surgery. Objective: To compare the anaesthetic potential of bupivacaine 0.25% and ropivacaine 0.25% for infra-umbilical surgical procedures. Methods: This study included 60 children of ASA (American society of anesthesiologists) I & II grade of either gender, scheduled for various elective infra-umbilical surgical procedures. Patients were randomized to receive bupivacaine 0.25% or ropivacaine 0.25% each total dose of 1 ml kg-1. The randomization sequence was computer-generated and prepared in a double-blind man¬ner. Post-operative motor block was assessed with Bromage motor scale and postoperative analgesia was observed with an observer pain scale. Statistical data were analyzed by using student’s unpaired t-test. Results: The mean duration of analgesia in group B was 266.0±1.89 minutes and group R was 251±2.68 minutes. The differ¬ence was statistically highly significant (p<0.0001). The mean duration of motor block in group B was 236.0±1.89 minutes and in the group, R was 204±2.22 minutes. The difference was statistically highly significant (p<0.0001). Conclusion: In the present study caudal administration of bupivacaine 0.25% (1 ml kg-1) resulted in a longer duration of anal¬gesia and motor block compared with 0.25% ropivacaine (1 ml kg-1), with no significant difference in the hemodynamics and the incidence of side effects.
URI: http://172.20.40.131:80/jspui/handle/123456789/3507
ISSN: 2231-2196
Appears in Collections:Faculty Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
3212_pdf.pdf585.57 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.