DSpace logo
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://172.20.40.131:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/3542
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLakhani, Sucheta-
dc.contributor.authorHatkar, Sunil-
dc.contributor.authorLakhani, Som J.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-20T13:54:57Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-20T13:54:57Z-
dc.date.issued2020-12-
dc.identifier.issn2249-782X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://172.20.40.131:80/jspui/handle/123456789/3542-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The Staphylococcus species do not directly cause infection but invade an already existing wound and causing extensive tissue necrosis and enlarging an already existing wound. The human host factor plays a major role in the pathogenesis by making a suitable environment for pathogens, like diabetic mellitus, hypertension, and so on. The emergence of methicillin resistant strains worsens the clinical output and very few therapeutic alternatives are left to treat such infections. Aim: The present study was attempted to see the relation of Staphylococcus species with host factors among wound infections. Materials and Methods: The specimens taken from various types of wound infection were screened for Staphylococcus species as per standard microbiological guidelines. The clinical history of the patients were taken from the ‘patient’s case record form’ and Medical Record Department (MRD) section. The data was statistically analysed, p-value ≤0.05 was considered significant. Results: A total of 421 Staphylococcus species were isolated from various clinical samples, out of which 159 (37.7%) were isolated from wound infections. Of which 142 (89.3%) were S.aureus and 17 (10.7%) were S.epidermidis. Diabetic mellitus 29 (18.2%) and hypertension 11 (7%) were found to be a major host factor facilitating the infection. Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was 100 (62.9%) while Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) was not found in the single strain. Inducible clindamycin resistant strains among wound infection were found to be 58 (36.5%). Conclusion: Staphylococcal wound infections should be carefully treated to prevent microbial spread especially in immune-compromised patients, better patient recovery, and reducing healthcare costs.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Researchen_US
dc.subjectChronic Woundsen_US
dc.subjectCo-Morbiditiesen_US
dc.subjectMethicillin Resistanten_US
dc.subjectStaphylococcus Aureusen_US
dc.titlePrevalence and Factors Associated with Wound Colonisation by Staphylococcus Species at Tertiary Care Hospital: A Cross-sectional Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
47419_CE[Ra]_F(Sh)_PF1(AG_SHU)_PFA(SHU)_PB(AG_SHU)_PN(SL).pdf301.44 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.