DSpace logo
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://172.20.40.131:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/502
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSinhal, Tapati Manohar-
dc.contributor.authorRani, Ruchi-
dc.contributor.authorShah, Purvesh-
dc.contributor.authorJais, Pratik-
dc.contributor.authorShah, Nimisha-
dc.contributor.authorHadwani, Krupali-
dc.contributor.authorRothe, Tushar-
dc.contributor.authorSinhal, Neha-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-06T06:18:37Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-06T06:18:37Z-
dc.date.issued2018-06-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/502-
dc.description.abstractAim: The aim of this study is to compare and to evaluate sealing ability of newly introduced C‑point system, cold lateral condensation, and thermoplasticized gutta‑percha obturating technique using a dye extraction method. Materials and Methodology: Sixty extracted maxillary central incisors were decoronated below the cementoenamel junction. Working length was established, and biomechanical preparation was done using K3 rotary files with standard irrigation protocol. Teeth were divided into three groups according to the obturation protocol; Group I‑Cold lateral condensation, Group II‑Thermoplasticized gutta‑percha, and Group III‑C‑Point obturating system. After obturation all samples were subjected to microleakage assessment using dye extraction method. Obtained scores will be statistical analyzed using ANOVA test and post hoc Tukey’s test. Results: One‑way analysis of variance revealed that there is significant difference among the three groups with P value (0.000 < 0.05). Tukey’s HSD post hoc tests for multiple comparisons test shows that the Group II and III perform significantly better than Group I. Group III performs better than Group II with no significant difference. Conclusion: All the obturating technique showed some degree of microleakage. Root canals filled with C‑point system showed least microleakage followed by thermoplasticized obturating technique with no significant difference among them. C‑point obturation system could be an alternative to the cold lateral condensation technique.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherContemporary Clinical Dentistryen_US
dc.subjectApical microleakageen_US
dc.subjectCold lateral condensationen_US
dc.subjectC‑point obturation systemen_US
dc.subjectDye extractionen_US
dc.subjectThermoplasticized obturating techniqueen_US
dc.titleAn In vitro Comparison and Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Newly Introduced C‑point System, Cold Lateral Condensation, and Thermoplasticized Gutta‑Percha Obturating Technique: A Dye Extraction Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ContempClinDent92164-8351641_021911.pdf1.14 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.