
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://172.20.40.131:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/559
Title: | Comparison of Progrip Mesh V/S Conventional Mesh in Lichtenstein’s Inguinal Hernia Repair |
Authors: | Maharaul, Honeypalsinh H. Shory, Vipul Joshi, Shivang P. |
Keywords: | Inguinal Hernia Progrip Mesh Conventional Mesh |
Issue Date: | 2016 |
Publisher: | International Journal of Biomedical Research |
Abstract: | Introduction: Inguinal hernia is a very common disease. It is estimated that at least 5% of the population will develop a groin hernia in their lifetime, making groin hernia repair one of the most common operations performed by general surgeons. The only way to treat inguinal hernia is surgery. Aim: The aim of our study is to compare the outcome after Lichtenstein’s inguinal hernia repair using conventional mesh v/s self-fixating Progrip mesh. The primary endpoint of the study will be the incidence of post-operative pain Objectives: 1) To compare the outcome in terms of operative time. 2) To compare possibility of complications. 3) To compare postoperative pain. Conclusion: Lichtenstein’s inguinal hernia repair using self-fixating Progrip mesh has an advantage over conventional mesh in terms of less operative time and post-operative pain. |
URI: | http://localhost:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/559 |
ISSN: | 2455-0566 |
Appears in Collections: | Faculty Publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
document.pdf | 1.34 MB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.