DSpace logo
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://172.20.40.131:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/71
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAgrawal, Anuja-
dc.contributor.authorChauhan, Jitendra-
dc.contributor.authorParikh, Hetal-
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-25T08:40:44Z-
dc.date.available2019-06-25T08:40:44Z-
dc.date.issued2017-09-
dc.identifier.issn2249-555X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/71-
dc.description.abstractBackground And Goals: Development of selective alpha 2 adrenoceptor agonists may provide a new concept for the administration of periopertive anaesthesia & analgesia in day care surgeries. Goal of this study was to compare Inj. Dexmedetomidine & Inj.Butorphanol with respect to time required for onset & offset of sedation, quality of intraoperative as well as postoperative analgesia & the time required for post-operative recovery. Methods: After obtaining permission from Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC), study was conducted in 40 patients of ASA I and II divided into 2 groups A & B by computer generated random number table. Patients, in group A received inj Dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg i.v and group B received inj. Butorphanol 10 mcg/kg i.v, in infusion over 10 minutes prior to induction. Induction was done with inj Propofol i.v 2mg/kg & maintained with 33% O2, 66%N2O & 0.6-0.8% of isoflurane with patient breathing spontaneously. Throughout the surgery the sedation and analgesia was maintained with inj Dexmedetomidine 0.7 microgram/kg/hr infusion in group A and with inj Butorphanol 2 microgram/kg/hr in group B. Patients were evaluated in postoperative recovery room with help of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, Ramsay Sedation Score & Standard Aldrete Score for recovery. Results: Demographically, the two groups were similar. Requirement of inhalational anaesthetic agents was significantly reduced in the group A (p < 0.05).VAS was significantly less(2.75 ± 0.44) in the group B after 90 min and earlier rescue analgesia was given in group A ( p < 0.05). Eye opening was earlier (45.5 ± 23.61) in group A and was highly significant (p < 0.001). Postop recovery was significantly improved (9.8 ± 0.41) with dexmeditomidine group. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine produces better sedation and analgesia without significant adverse effects and can be used as sole sedative and analgesic for day care surgery patients with better recovery.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherIndian Journal of Applied Researchen_US
dc.subjectDexmedetomidineen_US
dc.subjectButorphanol,en_US
dc.subjectAnalgesiaen_US
dc.subjectRamsay Sedation Scoreen_US
dc.titleComparison of Efficacy of Infusions Of Dexmedetomidine Versus Butorphanol as Sedative & Analgesic in Short General Anaesthesia In Day Care Gynaecological Surgeriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
402-1596-1-PB.pdf706.87 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.